Advertisement

'Ridiculous': Controversy erupts as AFL rule 'exploited' in final seconds

Confusion erupted in Gold Coast’s thrilling last-gasp win over Carlton, with many believing the Suns deliberately flouted the new 6-6-6 rule in the final seconds.

Jack Bowes’ last-minute snap pinched a two-point victory for Gold Coast and cruelly kept Carlton winless on Sunday.

Bowes put the Suns in front with just 10 seconds to play, but controversy erupted from the ensuing centre bounce when Gold Coast fell foul of the 6-6-6 rule:

Many believed Carlton should have been awarded what could have been a match-changing free kick, but umpires simply dished out a warning.

However in bizarre scenes, the Suns actually appeared to have an extra man in their own forward 50, rather than up back defending their lead like many thought.

The Suns fell foul of the 6-6-6 rule. Image: Fox Footy
The Suns fell foul of the 6-6-6 rule. Image: Fox Footy

Regardless, the umpire’s decision to dish out a warning left a number of fans and pundits fuming.

Former player Mick McGuane unloaded on Twitter, saying the rule was being deliberately ‘exploited’.

“Message to AFL : please p*** off the warning when a team doesn’t set up the 6,6,6 rule at centre bounces,” he wrote.

“Give a free kick against if they transgress. It is amateurish. It is being exploited. This is AFL football played by professionals so don’t give them an out. #AFLSunsBlues”

Veteran journo Peter Ryan also believed a free kick should have been awarded, and he wasn’t alone.

Collingwood coach Nathan Buckley has previously expressed his dislike for the warning, fearing this exact scenario would play out.

“It’s exploitable, that’s why it’s an absolute joke to have a warning … how can you have a warning?” he told SEN Radio.

“Why wouldn’t you, with eight seconds left in the game roll the dice?

“If you get away with it then great, you’ve got an advantage, and if you don’t, well, then it’s only a warning.”