The Manly Sea Eagles have revealed Reuben Garrick fractured his back in the controversial tackle from Charnze Nicoll-Klokstad that the NRL deemed wasn't dangerous. In a club statement released on Tuesday, the Sea Eagles said: "Scans have confirmed Garrick suffered a fractured transverse process in his back after landing heavily in the second half (against the Warriors)."
Controversy erupted in the aftermath of the incident, after the referee and Bunker deemed there was nothing illegal about the play, despite Nicoll-Klokstad wiping out Garrick's legs while he was jumping for a ball. Under NRL rules, mid-air tackles are allowed if the ball has bounced - as was the case on Friday night.
'NEVER SEEN THAT': Latrell in fresh furore over 'damning' footage
However many felt the tackle could have resulted in a penalty because Garrick was placed in a dangerous position, with his legs flung way above his head before he landed on his back. But NRL head of football Graham Annesley disagreed on Monday and said the referee and Bunker got it right in not penalising the Warriors.
Manly indicated post match Reuben Garrick wasn’t in a good way after this incident. By video hope is injury limited to significant back/hip contusion rather than structural damage. Usually relatively quick recovery but likely in some doubt for Rd 26 considering traumatic nature pic.twitter.com/pWGEhvDoXs
— NRL PHYSIO (@nrlphysio) August 19, 2023
"We'll review all the rules and if there is a way of making the game safer, we have always defaulted to that," Annesley said. "(But) under the existing rule, there was no requirement on the referees to form a view that that was a breach of the rules."
Annesley said he did not believe Nicoll-Klokstad's conduct came with an unacceptable risk of injury. "Injury alone is not a determination of whether the rules have been breached or not," he said.
"(Players) can get injured in legitimate tackles, so you have to look at this particular situation and look at the circumstances. Was there any lack of care taken by Nicoll-Klokstad? I don't think there was."
NRL world left fuming after Reuben Garrick development
The decision not to award the Sea Eagles a penalty proved a huge turning point. A shot at goal would have seen Manly take a 24-22 lead late in the game, but the Warriors scored on the ensuing possession and went on to win 29-22. Marata Niukore made a break before running straight past a visibly hampered Garrick to score the match-winning try.
With just two games left in the regular season and Manly's finals hopes in tatters, the Sea Eagles are very unlikely to risk playing Garrick again. However the club said he "remains in doubt" for the final two games, and the fullback reportedly wants to keep playing because he can't do any further damage. The revelation that he fractured his back in a tackle that was deemed 'not dangerous' left fans fuming on Tuesday.
— The Mole (@9_Moley) August 22, 2023
And people on here were seriously saying he wasn’t put into a dangerous position because he landed on his back 😭
— Nathan (@SeaEagleSpur) August 22, 2023
Tell that to the NRL who are liable for allowing and accepting such dangerous act.
— E-MAN (@eman01) August 22, 2023
And the refs did sfa, ridiculous
— Footyfan (@FootyFa87880138) August 22, 2023
Oh but it wasn’t a dangerous tackle says Annesley because he landed on his back fair dinkum 😈😈😈😈😈😈😈😈😈😈😈😈😈😈😈😈😈😈😈
— eagerly (@DonSull81111517) August 22, 2023
And the NRL said there was nothing wrong with this tackle
— Geoff F 🦅🐏🦅🦢👑 (@Bb2Geoff) August 22, 2023
Play on (apparently).
Player safety ➡️🗑️
— Smokey Johansson (@smokeyjoh) August 22, 2023
Anthony Seibold unleashes over 'ridiculous' rule
Speaking after the game, Manly coach Anthony Seibold said: "It was ridiculous, absolutely ridiculous. That's a penalty every day of the week.
"The rule says it's not because the ball bounced, or it wasn't a kick, but how many times do we pull a tackle up for a slight crusher, give a penalty?
"Or someone slipping up from the chest to the jaw and it's a penalty? Like fair dinkum, let's be serious. We go two points up with six minutes to go there.
"(Instead), they get the ball back, Reuben can't run. We make a poor defensive error but our fullback can't run and we're saying it's not a dangerous tackle. It was a dangerous tackle. He was injured. He couldn't finish the game. And it's our season on the line so I am pissed off about it."
Sign up to our newsletter and score the biggest sport stories of the week.