- Oops!Something went wrong.Please try again later.
- Oops!Something went wrong.Please try again later.
- Swiss tennis player
- Japanese tennis player
Naomi Osaka has inevitably been dragged into Roger Federer's shock decision to withdraw from Roland Garros, with many slamming the French Open's response to both situations.
Federer stunned the tennis world on Sunday when he pulled out of the French Open a day after winning a tough third-round match that finished close to 1am.
'WHAT ON EARTH': Disbelief over Serena Williams shocker
'RIDICULOUS': Insane Rafa Nadal moment stuns tennis world
The 39-year-old didn't specify that he was injured, simply saying he was opting to save himself for the grass-court season and what would be a fairytale 21st grand slam title at Wimbledon.
"After two knee operations and more than a year of rehabilitation, it's important that I listen to my body and not rush back into competition," he said.
Federer's decision has sparked some backlash in the tennis world, mostly around the fact that he denied third-round opponent Dominik Koepfer a place in the fourth-round and a bigger payday.
However French Open officials were full of praise when reacting to Federer's withdrawal, despite it seemingly being against the spirit of the sport.
"The Roland Garros tournament is sorry about the withdrawal of Roger Federer, who put up an incredible fight last night," said Guy Forget, the tournament director.
"We were all delighted to see Roger back in Paris, where he played three high-level matches. We wish him all the best for the rest of the season."
Forget's response was in complete contrast to the way he and other French Open officials responded to Osaka's decision to skip her press conferences in Paris due to mental health reasons.
Organisers initially slammed Osaka and threatened her with expulsion from the tournament, before she eventually withdrew of her own accord.
"I think this is a phenomenal mistake. It shows to what extent today (the need) that there is strong governance in tennis," French Tennis Federation President Gilles Moretton initially said of Osaka.
"What is happening there is, in my opinion, not acceptable. We will stick to the laws and rules for penalties and fines."
Fans and pundits were quick to point out the disparity between responses to the situations involving Osaka and Federer, while retired American player Mardy Fish said the French Open only had themselves to blame for both.
So the French Open lost Osaka (didn’t know how to handle a mental health issue) and Federer (scheduling) 🤔
Two of the biggest draws in all of Sport
— Mardy Fish (@MardyFish) June 6, 2021
Osaka: Hi guys I’d love to play but feel like I need to take a step away from press conferences.#RolandGarros: FINES! THREAT OF EXPULSION!
Federer: Hi guys I’m dipping out because I’m scared my knee won’t get me to Wimbledon.#RolandGarros: It’s okay Roger baby we love you.
— Amy Andrews (@AmyJAndrews) June 6, 2021
— Mark A Prince Jr (@MarkAPrinceJr) June 6, 2021
The inequity of how the tournament reacted to the Federer & Osaka scenarios is staggering. If the roles were reversed - would they have threatened Federer with expulsion from future grand slams? I think not.
— Dave Courteen (@davecourteen) June 6, 2021
Federer can listen to his body and do what’s best (use RG as a warm up for grass) but naomi can’t listen to her body and do what’s best (take a break from press for this tournament)
— Tessa Juliette (@tessa_juliette) June 6, 2021
— ᱬ Katty (@HouseOfWanda) June 6, 2021
So Federer can withdraw from your tournament for no apparent injuries, he simply listens to his body, but when Osaka wants to protect her health by wanting changes in how the tournament ensure the safety of players during PC, you threaten to disqualify and suspend her? Disgusting
— Brandneway (@_Brandneway) June 6, 2021
Roger Federer cops backlash over French Open withdrawal
While Federer has copped some backlash, the level of vitriol hasn't been the same as when Osaka first announced her intention to boycott media commitments.
But American greats John and Patrick McEnroe were two high-profile names to criticise Federer.
“I understand it, but I don’t like it. It’s just not a great look to pull out of a tournament in the middle," Patrick McEnroe told the New York Times.
“It’s one thing if you sprain an ankle badly and finish a match on adrenaline. Those things happen. But it’s another thing when you kind of go into a tournament knowing that you probably aren’t going to be able to really finish the tournament."
John McEnroe was also gobsmacked, telling NBC: “Perhaps Roger might have done the magnanimous thing and defaulted match point up (against Koepfer) … but that’s easy for me to say from Malibu."
While Former Australian Open tournament director Paul McNamee criticised Federer on Twitter, writing: "You're not at a candy store, able to pick and choose which matches you play, as your actions affect others, and the tournament."
However Chris Evert said Federer is "free to do whatever he wants".
"He has paid his dues, he's 39, his goal is Wimbledon on the grass, his dream tournament, where the rallies are shorter and it favours mobility and power," she said.
"I think he surprised himself that he got to the second week of the French. I think he was using it as practice matches but obviously with the wear and tear, when he hasn't played for such a long time, takes its toll on a 39-year-old body.
"I'm 100% behind him and it shouldn't be a knock to the tournament. He wants to be the best prepared for Wimbledon."
Watch 'Mind Games', the new series from Yahoo Sport Australia exploring the often brutal mental toil elite athletes go through in pursuit of greatness:
Click here to sign up to our newsletter for all the latest and breaking stories from Australia and around the world.