Bombshell court twist in infamous football WAG feud

·4-min read
Pictured left is Coleen Rooney alongside a photo of fellow football WAG Rebekah Vardy.
Coleen Rooney (L) has accused her former friend Rebekah Vardy of leaking stories about her personal life to the British press. Pic: Getty

Famous football WAG and influencer Coleen Rooney has been forced to stump up more than $120,000 in legal costs after losing her latest court battle with former friend, Rebekah Vardy.

The wife of former England star Wayne Rooney, dubbed "Wagatha Christie" by the British press, claimed Mrs Vardy had shared fake stories she posted on her personal Instagram account with The Sun newspaper.

'LEFT A HOLE IN HIS FOOT': How cold cases are haunting ex-players

'ASHAMED': Football great quits in disgrace over texts to female staff

'PATHETIC': Football world fumes over Manchester United 'disgrace'

Rooney and Vardy - the wife of Leicester City star Jamie Vardy - used to be good friends until the scandal broke that has captured the football world's attention.

In an October 2019 post on Twitter, Instagram and Facebook, Mrs Rooney, 35, accused Mrs Vardy, 39, of leaking stories about her private life after a months-long “sting operation”.

Having narrowed down her list of potential suspects, Coleen ended her sensational post with: “It’s... Rebekah Vardy’s account."

Mrs Vardy denies the accusations and is suing Mrs Rooney for libel in a saga that has stretched on for more than two years.

Mrs Rooney’s lawyers previously claimed that Mrs Vardy had leaked information to The Sun either directly or through her agent Caroline Watt “acting on her instruction or with her knowing approval”.

Mrs Rooney asked for permission to bring an “additional claim” against Ms Watt for misuse of private information and wanted it to be heard alongside the libel case.

Her barrister David Sherborne told the court last week that if Mrs Vardy wins her claim on the basis that she was not the person who leaked the information, then Mrs Rooney will be left without “vindication” unless she is able to bring the claim against Ms Watt as part of the same case.

Mrs Vardy’s lawyers opposed the application to add the claim against Ms Watt to the libel case.

In a ruling on Monday, following a two-day hearing last week, Mrs Justice Steyn refused permission for the additional claim against Ms Watt and refused permission for it to be heard alongside the libel trial.

The High Court judge said the bid was brought too late and that previous opportunities to make the claim had not been taken.

Mrs Rooney will now have to pay £65,000 ($A123,000) towards Ms Watt’s legal costs, said to be around £70,000 ($A133,000).

Seen here, Coleen and Wayne Rooney attend the world premiere of the new Amazon Prime documentary
Coleen and Wayne Rooney attend the world premiere of the new Amazon Prime documentary "Rooney" in February, 2022. Pic: Getty

Coleen Rooney free to pursue separate legal action

The judge’s decision does not prevent Mrs Rooney from pursuing a separate claim against Ms Watt for alleged misuse of private information if she wishes to.

During the two-day hearing last week, the High Court heard that some WhatsApp messages between Mrs Vardy and Ms Watt had been disclosed ahead of the trial.

Mrs Justice Steyn said in her ruling that some of these messages, which had been redacted but could be read by Mrs Rooney’s legal team because of a “software error”, should have been made available.

These included a message where Mrs Vardy told Ms Watt she “would love to leak those stories x”, which Mrs Rooney’s lawyers claim refers to her private information.

Discussing this text in her ruling, Mrs Justice Steyn said: “First, in circumstances where, in the midst of a WhatsApp account that appears on its face, and I do not understand it to be disputed, to concern the defendant, the claimant states that she would ‘love to leak those stories’, I do not accept that it is open to the claimant’s representatives to make the determination, on the basis of their client’s instructions, that she was not referring to stories about the defendant.

“That may or may not be so, it is a matter for trial.”

The trial of the libel claim is due to take place in May, but may be delayed, with a pre-trial hearing set for April.

After the ruling, a spokesman said Mrs Rooney and her legal team "remain confident of winning this case when it comes to trial in May".

The spokesman for Mrs Rooney continued: "Coleen is pleased that today's judgment leaves it open to her to bring separate legal action against Caroline Watt, following the details of telling WhatsApp conversations between her and Mrs Vardy laid before the court last week.

"The judgment does nothing to alter the fact that Ms Watt will be a witness in this case."

with agencies

Click here to sign up to our newsletter for all the latest and breaking stories from Australia and around the world.

Our goal is to create a safe and engaging place for users to connect over interests and passions. In order to improve our community experience, we are temporarily suspending article commenting