- Oops!Something went wrong.Please try again later.
The Australian government has offered a detailed explanation about the reasons why it cancelled the visa of Novak Djokovic for a second time, setting up a dramatic showdown in Federal Court on Sunday.
The visa drama of Djokovic has dominated the build-up to the Australian Open, with the playing status of the nine-time champion still to be decided in court.
'QUITE LIKELY': The 'inevitable' situation facing Novak Djokovic
'IRRATIONAL': Lawyer slams Novak Djokovic 'anti-vax' sentiment
'THIS IS FALSE': Authorities shoot down Novak Djokovic rumours
Djokovic has had his visa cancelled twice and faces deportation unless he is successful in Sunday's court action.
If he is unsuccessful, the World No.1 faces the very real possibility of being banned from entering Australia again for three years.
In an email outlining his detailed reasons for cancelling Djokovic's visa for a second time, Immigration Minister Alex Hawke conceded the unvaccinated tennis star poses a "negligible" risk of spreading Covid-19 to others.
However, Mr Hawke argues that allowing the 20-time grand slam winner to remain Down Under may be a risk "to the health of the Australian community".
The government argues that Djokovic's mere presence during the Australian Open could stoke "anti-vaccination sentiment" and encourage others to disregard isolation rules.
"I have given consideration to the fact that Mr Djokovic is a high profile unvaccinated individual who has indicated publicly that he is opposed to becoming vaccinated against Covid-19," the Immigration Minister wrote.
"In addition, I consider that Mr Djokovic's ongoing presence in Australia may lead to an increase in anti-vaccination sentiment generated in the Australian community, potentially leading to an increase in civil unrest of the kind previously experienced in Australia with rallies and protests which may themselves be a source of community transmission."
The minister says it could also lead to other unvaccinated Australians refusing to get the jab, anti-vaxxers having their views reinforced and a reduction in the uptake of booster doses.
Referencing Djokovic's self-described "error in judgement" to proceed with an interview with a French magazine journalist last month after being informed of his positive COVID-19 result, Mr Hawke said that may "foster similar disregard for the precautionary requirements following receipt of a positive Covid-19 test in Australia".
"His behaviour may encourage or influence others to emulate his prior conduct and fail to comply with appropriate health measures following a positive COVID-19 test, which itself could lead to the transmission of the disease and serious risk to their health and others," he wrote.
The World No.1's false Australian travel declaration, which suggested he had not travelled in the past 14 days before arriving in Melbourne, was not a factor in the decision after the player's agent provided a statutory declaration accepting responsibility.
Government stance focused on protecting Australian public
The minister said he considered the likely "significant" inconvenience, emotional hardship and distress of cancelling Djokovic's visa, on top of possible reputational damage and professional implications including his inability to compete in the Australian Open.
But ultimately Mr Hawke decided the long list of health, good order and public interest ramifications outweighed the personal damage it could potentially cause the tennis star.
"These matters go to the very preservation of life and health of many members of the general community and further are crucial to maintaining the health system in Australia, which is facing increasing strain in the current circumstances of the pandemic," he said.
Earlier, there was no sign of Djokovic during Saturday's procedural hearing of the Federal Court of Australia.
The 34-year-old had been due to meet with immigration officials at an undisclosed location in Melbourne at 8am on Saturday before being detained.
Justice O'Callaghan raised the possibility of convening a full court of three judges for Sunday's hearing, scheduled for 9.30am AEDT, instead of a single judge.
It was supported was Djokovic's representative Paul Holdenson QC, but opposed by the government due to the fact neither party would be able to appeal the outcome.
"Having the matter referred to the full court would remove any party's right to appeal," said Stephen Lloyd SC, representing Mr Hawke.
Click here to sign up to our newsletter for all the latest and breaking stories from Australia and around the world.