Advertisement

Bizarre NY Times theory links Federer loss to global warming

A New York Times report suggesting Roger Federer became a “spokesman for climate change” following his shock US Open loss to Aussie John Millman has created a firestorm.

The report, entitled ‘Roger Federer Is Tough to Beat. Global Warming Might Have Pulled an Upset’, stated Federer had become “an unwitting spokesman for the effects of climate change” after he complained about the heat following his stunning round of 16 exit.

Reporter Kendra Pierre-Louis explained how Federer was ruined by the combination of heat and humidity on Tuesday (AEST), with the heat index, which indicates a ‘feels like’ temperature, in the 90s.

Roger Federer couldn’t handle the heat and humidity at Arthur Ashe Stadium in New York as he lost to John Millman. Pic: Getty
Roger Federer couldn’t handle the heat and humidity at Arthur Ashe Stadium in New York as he lost to John Millman. Pic: Getty

The temperature on the night at Arthur Ashe Stadium in New York hovered around 30 degrees Celsius.

Jake Crouch a scientist at National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, labelled those measurements as “incredible” for a September night.

“That’s a hot heat index (more commonly seen) in the middle in the middle of summer, in the middle of the day, for New York,” Crouch told The Times.

But while its near impossible to argue it’s getting hotter, and the temperature for Federer’s match was unseasonably hot, to state ‘global warming pulled an upset’ and Federer had become a “spokesman” for the phenomenon seemed a step too far for many tennis fans.

Aussie basketball star Andrew Bogut even fired up about the piece, joking that he thought he was reading satirical site ‘The Onion’.

Federer himself was quoted in the article, explaining how the heat and humidity had an impact on his output.

“It was hot. It was just one of those nights where I guess I felt I couldn’t get air; there was no circulation at all,” Federer said.

“I just struggled in the conditions. It’s one of the first times it’s happened to me.

“It’s uncomfortable. Clearly just kept on sweating more and more and more and more as the match goes on. You lose energy as it goes by.”

Federer also stated his opponent, Brisbane-based John Millman, had a huge advantage, given the climate he is accustomed to.

“John was able to deal with it better. He maybe comes from one of the most humid places on earth, Brisbane!” Federer said.

The Swiss maestro also took a jab at tournament organisers for their decision to build a roof on Arthur Ashe Stadium.

Federer argued the structure around the new roof stopped air flow into the court, whether the roof is open or not.

“I do believe since the roof is on that there is no air circulation in the stadium. I think just that makes it a totally different US Open,” the world number two said.

“Plus conditions maybe were playing slower this year on top of it. You have soaking wet pants, soaking wet everything.

“It was just tough. I thought John played a great match in difficult conditions.”