'Have some common sense': Controversy over Jack Riewoldt 'studs up' free kicks
Two marking contests by Richmond’s Jack Riewoldt have left AFL fans fuming, after the Tigers forward was twice penalised for having his studs up as he jumped for the ball against the West Coast Eagles.
Riewoldt could hardly contain his frustration with the field umpire when both contests were whistled, while coach Damien Hardwick was similarly frustrated.
The first came early in the second quarter, while a similar free kick was paid against Riewoldt in the dying minutes of the final quarter, when the Tigers were clinging to a narrow one goal lead.
The Tigers had the last laugh when Riewoldt booted the match-winning goal in the final minutes of the game, but that didn’t stop several prominent former players to express frustration of their own over the ruling.
Collingwood president Eddie McGuire said the two decisions were not what the rule was brought in to prevent.
“I was in the meeting when they came up with this rule and that's not what it was designed for," McGuire said during his commentary duties for Fox Footy.
Hardwick made his frustration clear when speaking to media after the game, imploring the league and umpires to ‘have some common sense’ when applying the rule.
The premiership-winning coach said the rule was brought in to prevent players from kicking another in the head, but questioned whether it was necessary at all.
"Have some common sense."
Damien Hardwick wasn't pleased with these two free kicks paid against Jack Riewoldt: https://t.co/uAYXvQj8qS pic.twitter.com/dbXIfSnzcn— AFL.com.au (@AFLcomau) August 18, 2019
Less rules for umpires: Hardwick
“I don’t think that’s why the rule was brought in for,” Hardwick said.
“If you don’t want high marks in the game, c’mon. I don’t think it’s a good rule personally.
“At the end of the day, the rule was brought in for the guy that kicks the guy in the head,” he said.
“The last time I looked, that player’s head wasn’t on his hamstring. Have some common sense.
“I didn’t know why we needed the rule in the first place to be honest, we seem to have a very reactive nature at stages.
“The game of AFL is so tough on these blokes. Don’t give them so many rules.”
Many fans and other footy experts took to social media to vent their frustration over the calls, with some labelling them ‘horrible’ and ‘disgusting’.
That's a disgusting decision against Riewoldt. This league is a joke sometimes. #afltigerseagles
— Jon (@GoldenViews00) August 18, 2019
The decision by the umpire that paid the kick out decision against Jack Riewoldt was just horrible. @AFL leave the game alone ! #afltigerseagles
— Brant Softley (@BigsofoBrant) August 18, 2019
Following AFL footy for over 20+ years , can’t remember a worse season of umpiring decisions.
— peter.goulis (@PGoulis) August 18, 2019
No one was pleased, umpires are an absolute joke
— Trifo (@djtrifo) August 18, 2019
RIP the high mark. Crazy rule.
— Benjamin Northey (@BenNorthey) August 18, 2019
"That was one of the worst calls I've seen, If the AFL say that was the right decision.
"Wow."
- Tony Shaw as the Eagles are handed a free kick off Jack Riewoldt's mark.#AFLTigersEagles— 3AW Football (@3AWisfootball) August 18, 2019
The down the free kick was a joke.
The free kick for the tackle on Rioli think for a goal was a joke.
Riewoldt having 2 marks taken off him were ridiculous.— Gary the GOAT. (@bowledgary) August 18, 2019
Wait wait wait, does Jack Riewoldt think a free kick he gave away shouldn't have been paid? I'm shocked
— Michael (@MWL152) August 18, 2019