Clarke better than Tendulkar?

Yahoo!7

Trending Now:

Clarke better than Tendulkar?

Create Reply

Page 1 of 1

Sort By:: Newest First; Oldest First

Mahatma Cote
22 Feb 2011
Sign in to report this post.

Posted Wed 04 Jan 2012 15:23

discuss

Neville
07 Apr 2009
Sign in to report this post.

Posted Sun 08 Jan 2012 16:55

Blood oath Clarke is better than tendulkar.....Clarke just scored a triple century and has heaps left in him as we are yet to play zimbabwe, bangladesh, etc and with the 2nd rate bowling attacks that tendulkar could not capitalize from Clarke will....

Tendulkar has not scored a triple century....come to think of it no Indian batsman has scored a triple century....HARGH HARGH HARGH

Blues
18 Dec 2008
Sign in to report this post.

Posted Mon 23 Jan 2012 14:01

who is this Neville idiot, I think too much speed has gone to neville,s brain... and not from the motorcycle either... check out Tendulkars record idiot..

Ceeamm

Sign in to report this post.

Posted Tue 24 Jan 2012 05:41

Clarke has better form in this series, but Sachin has far and away the better career stats.

He's got every batting record except the highest Test score ( 400 to Brian Lara ) and the best batting average ( 99.94 to Sir Don Bradman ).

sammy
20 Jan 2009
Sign in to report this post.

Posted Sat 28 Jan 2012 08:10

hello...helloo............Tendulkar is much much better than clarke,he is the king of cricket ,even aussie and other players have dream to play with him,they appreciate him for good records.

Ganapati
31 Mar 2010
Sign in to report this post.

Posted Mon 30 Jan 2012 09:02

''The star system is well and truly ingrained in the Indian team and things won't improve, certainly not on the overseas Test match front, until this is changed,'' Chappell said yesterday in the Hindustan Times. ''The problem is that the star system is part of India's general culture and it's going to be difficult to change the approach in the cricket team.

''The average Indian fan is satisfied if Tendulkar scores a hundred but the team loses.

''India … needs to become a group of cricketers who perform as a team. It doesn't help when a number of those individually bright stars are playing for their own survival.

''Recent successes in all forms of the game has led to sloppy habits instead of a work and thought ethic that will bring prolonged success.

''Australia has played hard, competitive and smart cricket while India has just capitulated.''

What has been implied?

Neville
07 Apr 2009
Sign in to report this post.

Posted Thu 02 Feb 2012 19:58

Kholi proved himself to better than tendulka this series and tendulka proved yet again that he cannot perform consistantly away from the doctored pitches of the sub-continent.....
Paul are you selling speed? how much dude?